Genuine Fortuitousness. Where Did That Click Come From?

Foundations of Physics 31 (5):757-774 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper presents a revised view of quantum mechanics centered on the notion (“genuine fortuitousness”) that the click in a counter is a totally lawless event, which comes by itself. A crucial point is the distinction between events on the spacetime scene and the content of the symbolic algorism. A revised conception of matrix variables emerges, by which such a variable, as part of a whole, does not have a value, under any circumstance. This conception is at variance with that of indeterminate variables. A matrix variable not having a value does not enter spacetime and is not a measurable quantity, but manifests itself by a click in a counter with the remarkable property of having an onset, a beginning, from which the click develops. The individual click with its immense complexity is unique and lawless, even beyond probability. The notion of probability only applies to clicks in low resolution, and the completeness of a probabilistic theory is thereby seen in a new perspective. The genuinely fortuitous click is not produced by the impact of a particle, nor caused by an event in the source prior to the click in the counter. Indeed, there are no particles on the spacetime scene. The theory is thereby liberated from notions, which go with particles having indeterminate variables, and which have given to quantum mechanics the image of an unfathomable theory. With no particle as intermediary, the connection between source and detector is non-local, as is the entire theory, which deals exclusively with distributions of clicks. The locality permeating quantum mechanics is a symbolic one. The wave function enters in the sole role of encoding the probability distributions of clicks. The quest to understand the occurrence of the click in terms of the evolution of the wave function loses its meaning. However, click distributions in low resolution can be analyzed in terms of the connection between click distributions for different sets of counters, as given by the wave function. With increasing resolution, the probabilities, and the wave function, gradually lose significance, whereby the onset remains beyond reach. Thus, the downward path from events on the spacetime scene does not extend beyond the onset. The notion that quantum mechanics deals with particles (or fields) is rooted in the historical evolution but appears unable to accomodate genuine fortuitousness. The latter concept is given its due place by fully accepting the abstract nature of the matrix variables

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Making Sense of a World of Clicks.Ulrich Mohrhoff - 2002 - Foundations of Physics 32 (8):1295-1311.
Click Click.Christine Stark - 2008 - Feminist Studies 34 (3):555-557.
Motor performance as a function of click reinforcement.Bradley Reynolds & Jack A. Adams - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (5):315.
Measurement of quantum states and the Wigner function.Antoine Royer - 1989 - Foundations of Physics 19 (1):3-32.
Bohmian mechanics.Sheldon Goldstein - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Statistical mechanics and the ontological interpretation.D. Bohm & B. J. Hiley - 1996 - Foundations of Physics 26 (6):823-846.
Probabilistic Time.C. Wetterich - 2012 - Foundations of Physics 42 (11):1384-1443.
The case against quantum duality.Alfred Landé - 1962 - Philosophy of Science 29 (1):1-6.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
83 (#198,229)

6 months
16 (#149,874)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Why Should We Interpret Quantum Mechanics?Louis Marchildon - 2004 - Foundations of Physics 34 (10):1453-1466.
Why I am not a QBist.Louis Marchildon - 2015 - Foundations of Physics 45 (7):754-761.
A QBist Ontology.U. J. Mohrhoff - 2022 - Foundations of Science 27 (3):1253-1277.
Making Sense of a World of Clicks.Ulrich Mohrhoff - 2002 - Foundations of Physics 32 (8):1295-1311.
Decoherence and the Copenhagen cut.Scott Tanona - 2013 - Synthese 190 (16):3625-3649.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations