Abstract

Traditionally it is believed that there are two requirements which must be met by a plausible normative theory of morality. It is expected to be sensitive to actual moral beliefs and to guide action. However, it is impossible to satisfy them both within the traditional approach to the tasks of moral theorizing. An alternative theory would have to provide intellectual tools for solution of actual moral problems in a way which would rely on judgment and imagination in practical reasoning. Moral theorizing would then be seen as part of moral practice and the philosopher’s role as that of a critical participant in moral practice rather than of a lawgiver with privileged access to moral truths.