Content Implication and the Yablo’s Sequent of Sentences

Logic and Logical Philosophy:1 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

If-Thenism—A Nominalistic Account of Talk About Abstracta?Katharina Felka - 2017 - Australasian Philosophical Review 1 (2):179-183.
Dual-Context Sequent Calculus and Strict Implication.Kentaro Kikuchi - 2002 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 48 (1):87-92.
Comments on Stephen Yablo’s Aboutness.Katharina Felka - 2018 - Erkenntnis 83 (6):1181-1194.
Eight Inference Rules for Implication.Michael Arndt - 2019 - Studia Logica 107 (4):781-808.
Gödelizing the Yablo Sequence.Cezary Cieśliński & Rafal Urbaniak - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (5):679-695.
Finding the question.Zoltán Gendler Szabó - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (3):779-786.
Precis of aboutness.Stephen Yablo - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (3):771-777.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-05-25

Downloads
16 (#886,588)

6 months
9 (#295,075)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Piotr Łukowski
University of Lodz

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Paradox without Self-Reference.Stephen Yablo - 1993 - Analysis 53 (4):251-252.
Truth and reflection.Stephen Yablo - 1985 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 14 (3):297 - 349.
Yablo’s paradox.Graham Priest - 1997 - Analysis 57 (4):236–242.
Abolition of the Fregean Axiom.Roman Suszko - 1975 - Lecture Notes in Mathematics 453:169-239.
Yablo's paradox.Graham Priest - 1997 - Analysis 57 (4):236-242.

View all 33 references / Add more references