Authors
Christy Mag Uidhir
University of Houston
Abstract
Most theories of suspense implicitly or explicitly have as a background assumption what I call suspense realism, i.e., that suspense is itself a genuine, distinct emotion. I claim that for a theory of suspense to entail suspense realism is for that theory to entail a contradiction, and so, we ought instead assume a background of suspense eliminativism, i.e., that there is no such genuine, distinct emotion that is the emotion of suspense. More precisely, I argue that i) any suspense realist (...) theory must resolve the paradox of suspense, ii) if suspense is itself a genuine, distinct emotion, then in order to resolve the paradox of suspense it must be a radically sui generis genuine, distinct emotion, iii) according to any minimally adequate theory of the emotions, there can be no radically sui generis emotion, and so iv) there can be no genuine, distinct emotion that is the emotion of suspense. Quite simply, if a theory of suspense must entail suspense realism, then we ought to be eliminativists about suspense. This I call the Paradox of Suspense Realism, which I take to constitute a productive viability condition for any theory of suspense, i.e., any viable theory of suspense must be mutatis mutandis compatible with suspense eliminativism.
Keywords Suspense  Emotion  Eliminativism  Aaron Smuts  Robert Yanal  Paradox of Suspense
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6245.2011.01458.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What is Eliminative Materialism?William G. Lycan & George S. Pappas - 1972 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50 (2):149-59.
The Paradox of Suspense.Robert J. Yanal - 1996 - British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (2):146-158.
The Paradox Of Suspense.Robert Yanal - 1996 - British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (2):146-158.
The Desire-Frustration Theory of Suspense.Aaron Smuts - 2008 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (3):281-291.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Paradox of Suspense.Aaron Smuts - 2009 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2009 (6.1):1-15.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Desire-Frustration Theory of Suspense.Aaron Smuts - 2008 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (3):281-291.
An Eliminativist Theory of Suspense.Christy Mag Uidhir - 2011 - Philosophy and Literature 35 (1):121-133.
The Paradox of Suspense.Aaron Smuts - 2009 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2009 (6.1):1-15.
Is There a Paradox of Suspense? A Reply to Yanal.Richard J. Gerrig - 1997 - British Journal of Aesthetics 37 (2):168-174.
Aristotle's Literary Aesthetics. Ferrari - 1999 - Phronesis 44 (3):181 - 198.
Aristotle's Literary Aesthetics. Ferrari - 1999 - Phronesis 44 (3):181-198.
Economic Page Turners.Björn Frank - 2012 - Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (3):317-327.
The Paradox of Suspense.Robert J. Yanal - 1996 - British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (2):146-158.
Suspense.Donald Beecher - 2007 - Philosophy and Literature 31 (2):255-279.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-10-22

Total views
389 ( #26,384 of 2,519,681 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
42 ( #20,376 of 2,519,681 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes