Conclusion

In Anaxagoras, Origen, and Neoplatonism: The Legacy of Anaxagoras to Classical and Late Antiquity. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 1463-1515 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Two types of multiple-conclusion systems.A. Avron - 1998 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 6 (5):695-718.
In defence of repugnance.Michael Huemer - 2008 - Mind 117 (468):899-933.
Probability and scepticism.Brian Weatherson - 2014 - In Dylan Dodd Elia Zardini (ed.), Scepticism and Perceptual Justification. Oxford University Press. pp. 71-86.
Origen and the Stoic View of Time.Panayiotis Tzamalikos - 1991 - Journal of the History of Ideas 52 (4):535-561.
Faith and the Existence of God.R. G. Swinburne - 1988 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 24:121-143.
Does the repugnant conclusion have any probative force?Christopher Cowie - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (12):3021-3039.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-11

Downloads
3 (#1,690,426)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references