The Evolution of Self-Determination for People with Psychotic Disorders

Ethics and Social Welfare 18 (1):71-87 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The history of the recovery movement began with a pushback against treatment, and the philosophies that it was founded upon still have relevant applications to contemporary social work practice. Financial aspects of service provision for people with serious mental illnesses have enabled other actors in the medical model of psychosis treatment to benefit, while disempowering and dehumanizing the consumers of those services. Since then, other movements like Psychopolitics and the Mad Movement have helped empower psychosis survivors to advocate for their right to self-determination amid the epistemological pressure to identify as disabled. Social workers would like to believe that the field has moved beyond the philosophies that perpetuated institutionalization of people with serious mental illnesses. Contemporary examples, however, reveal how social services in the US maintain the status quo of sanism for psychosis survivors.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

La détermination du nom : aspects diachroniques et évolution.Catherine Delesse - 2022 - Corela. Cognition, Représentation, Langage.
Bipolar Disorder and Self-Determination: Predicating Self-Determination at Scope.Elliot Porter - 2022 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 29 (3):133-145.
Involuntary antipsychotic medication and freedom of thought.Mari Stenlund - 2011 - Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 4 (2):31-33.
Self-determination as a universal human right.Cindy Holder - 2006 - Human Rights Review 7 (4):5-18.


Added to PP

20 (#769,678)

6 months
17 (#149,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?