A partially skeptical response to Hart and Russell [Book Review]

In Michał Heller & W. H. Woodin (eds.), Infinity: new research frontiers. New York: Cambridge University Press (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Infinity: new research frontiers.Michał Heller & W. H. Woodin (eds.) - 2011 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Argument from Skepticism for Contextualism.Jay Newhard - 2012 - Philosophia 40 (3):563-575.
The concept of law.Hla Hart - 1961 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Russell’s reasons for logicism.Ian Proops - 2006 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2):267-292.
Pragmatic causation.Antony Eagle - 2007 - In Huw Price & Richard Corry (eds.), Causation, Physics, and the Constitution of Reality: Russell's Republic Revisited. Oxford University Press.
Hart and Feinberg on responsibility.John Gardner - 2008 - In Matthew H. Kramer (ed.), The Legacy of H. Oxford University Press.
Fundamentalist Contextualist Compatibilism: A Response to the Consequence Argument.Garrett Pendergraft - unknown
Reply: The Nature and Virtue of Law.N. E. Simmonds - 2010 - Jurisprudence 1 (2):277-293.
The "Hart-Dworkin" debate : a short guide for the perplexed.Scott J. Shapiro - 2007 - In Arthur Ripstein (ed.), Ronald Dworkin. Cambridge University Press. pp. 22--49.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-21

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references