On the general argument against internalism

Synthese 170 (1):147 - 153 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I respond to John Greco’s argument that all forms of internalism in epistemology are either false or uninteresting. The paper divides into two sections. First, I explain precisely what internalists and externalists in epistemology disagree over. This puts us in a position to assess whether Greco’s argument succeeds. Second, I present Greco’s argument and offer two objections.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
435 (#43,318)

6 months
81 (#53,186)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Turri
University of Waterloo

Citations of this work

Internalist virtues and knowledge.Sarah Wright - 2010 - Acta Analytica 25 (2):119-132.
I Know I am Not Gettiered.Michael Veber - 2013 - Analytic Philosophy 54 (4):401-420.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Warrant: The Current Debate.Warrant and Proper Function.Alvin Plantinga - 1993 - New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.
Contemporary Theories of Knowledge.John Pollock - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (1):131-140.

View all 16 references / Add more references