Naturalistic Foundations of the Idea of the Holy: Darwinian Roots of Rudolf Otto's Theology

Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 12 (35):248-263 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The very influential theoretical concepts proposed by Rudolf Otto in his 1917 classic The Idea of the Holy are often seen as examples of properly religious content that cannot be approached by any other means except religious. This conclusion is challenged by closer readings of Otto’s writings on naturalism and religion where he, despite of being at times critical of some versions of naturalism, expresses his thorough commitment to naturalist ic explanations. Otto’s views are presented as compatible with recent cognitive-scientific theories of religion and as a constructive contribution to the scientific study of religion. Otto’s theological position, because it is based on his naturalism, is a possible methodological framework for further studies in religion and science in general and cognitive science of religion in particular

Similar books and articles

Schleiermacher and Otto on religion.Andrew Dole - 2004 - Religious Studies 40 (4):389-413.
Rudolf Otto's idea of the holy: A reappraisal.Owen Ware - 2007 - Heythrop Journal 48 (1):48–60.
Rudolf Otto's interpretation of religion.Robert F. Davidson - 1947 - Princeton,: Princeton University Press.
Methodology of Augustinian Science.S. Muhammad-Taqīy Mudarrisī - 2011 - Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities (69):7-39.
Schleiermacher and Otto on religion: A reappraisal.A. D. Smith - 2008 - Religious Studies 44 (3):295-313.
Feminism, Constructivism and Numinous Experience.Melissa Raphael - 1994 - Religious Studies 30 (4):511 - 526.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-06-23

Downloads
70 (#225,606)

6 months
14 (#154,299)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

.Wilhelm Windelband - 2008 - Folia Philosophica 26:45--58.
Varieties of naturalism.Owen Flanagan - 2006 - In Philip Clayton & Zachory Simpson (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 430--452.

Add more references