Debunking the skeptics

Abstract

is not about traditional skeptical thinkers like Descartes and Hume. Instead, it is about some of the ideas of today’s ”skeptics” — people who try to debunk things that seem too odd or too spiritual. This site is not meant to encourage weird beliefs, but it might make you wonder whether skepticism is a weird belief too.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Penelhum on skeptics and fideists.Eleonore Stump - 1986 - Synthese 67 (1):147 - 154.
Pyrrhonian skepticism.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.) - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Sextus empiricus on the possibility of inquiry.Filip Grgic - 2008 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (4):436-459.
Conditions on understanding language.Ernest Lepore - 1997 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 97 (1):41–60.
Descartes against the skeptics.Edwin M. Curley - 1978 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
90 (#183,310)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references