Doomed to fail: the sad epistemological fate

In Miroslaw Szatkowski (ed.), Ontological proofs today. Ontos Verlag. pp. 413-422 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For beings like us, no ontological argument can possibly succeed. They are doomed to fail. The point of an ontological argument is to enable nonempirical knowledge of its conclusion, namely, that God exists. But no ontological argument could possibly enable us to know its conclusion nonempirically, and so must fail in that sense

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-05-21

Downloads
165 (#112,103)

6 months
43 (#87,744)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Turri
University of Waterloo

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Meditations on First Philosophy.René Descartes - 1984 [1641] - Ann Arbor: Caravan Books. Edited by Stanley Tweyman.
Individualism and psychology.Tyler Burge - 1986 - Philosophical Review 95 (January):3-45.
A Theory of the a Priori.George Bealer - 1999 - Philosophical Perspectives 13:29-55.
Believing For a Reason.John Turri - 2011 - Erkenntnis 74 (3):383-397.

View all 14 references / Add more references