A (Partially) Skeptical Response to Hart and Russell

In Michał Heller & W. H. Woodin (eds.), Infinity: new research frontiers. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 290 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A partially skeptical response to Hart and Russell. [REVIEW]Denys A. Turner - 2011 - In Michał Heller & W. H. Woodin (eds.), Infinity: new research frontiers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Infinity: new research frontiers.Michał Heller & W. H. Woodin (eds.) - 2011 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Logical Atomism and Language.Sydney Shoemaker - 1959 - Analysis 20 (3):49 - 52.
Skeptical theism and value judgments.David James Anderson - 2012 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 72 (1):27-39.
Russell’s reasons for logicism.Ian Proops - 2006 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2):267-292.
The concept of law.Hla Hart - 1961 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-28

Downloads
14 (#965,243)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references