Fifteen years after ?Animal Liberation?: Has the animal rights movement achieved philosophical legitimacy? [Book Review]

Journal of Medical Humanities 13 (2):79-89 (1992)

Abstract

Fifteen years ago, Peter Singer published Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals. In it, he proposed to end “the tyranny of humans over nonhuman animals” by “thinking through, carefully, and consistently, the question of how we ought to treat animals” (p. ix). On this anniversary of the book's publication, a critical analysis shows that the logic he presents, though popularly appealing, is philosophically flawed. Though influential in slowing and in some cases stopping biomedical research involving animals, the animal rights movement in the United States has yet to offer a clear and compelling argument for the equlity of species.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,879

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-01-23

Downloads
219 (#53,734)

6 months
1 (#386,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Animal Liberation.Peter Singer (ed.) - 1977 - Avon Books.

Add more references

Citations of this work

The Problem of the Kantian Line.Samuel Kahn - 2019 - International Philosophical Quarterly 59 (2):193-217.

Add more citations