Human Studies 42 (4):647-672 (2019)

Abstract
This paper offers a critique of the special issue of Human Studies on “Alfred Schutz and Religion”. Following a line similar to that of Dominique Janicaud I call into question the very phenomenological status of the “phenomenology of religion” developed across the various contributions. Appealing to the Husserlian principle of freedom from presuppositions my critique focuses on the way these phenomenologies of religion talk about “religion”. At their core, the failure contained within these contributions is the failure to properly consider a question which begins any undergraduate Religious Studies program—what is “religion”? I charge that because these contributions take it as “self-evident” what religion “is” they allow a metaphysical assertion into their phenomenology which breaches the “neutrality” demanded of the principle of freedom from presuppositions. Drawing on the work of the Critical Religion project in Religious Studies I further highlight how this metaphysical assertion predicates an unavoidable ideological assertion, one which serves colonial mechanics of exclusion.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10746-019-09502-w
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,079
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Logical Investigations.Edmund Husserl - 1970 - London, England: Routledge.

View all 40 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Phenomenology of Religion - A Fundamental interpretation.Kim Wu - 2001 - Philosophy and Culture 28 (6):481-504.
Phenomenology of Religion.Mariasusai Dhavamony - 1973 - Rome, Gregorian University Press.
From Brain Imaging Religious Experience to Explaining Religion: A Critique.Marc Slors & Nina Azari - 2007 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 29 (1):67-86.
IJPR: Beyond the Limit and Limiting the Beyond. [REVIEW]Michael Purcell - 2010 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 68 (1-3):121-138.
Religion and Pseudo-Religion: An Elusive Boundary.Sami Pihlström - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 62 (1):3-32.
Une Nouvelle Ère de la Phénoménologie de la Religion? Sur les Récents Travaux de Natalie Depraz Et Anthony J. Steinbock.Sylvain Camilleri - 2012 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 4 (1):166-212.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-04-24

Total views
5 ( #1,203,194 of 2,506,103 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,984 of 2,506,103 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes