Beastly Contractarianism?

Essays in Philosophy 5 (2):474-486 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Social Contract theorists and animal advocates seem to have agreed to go their separate ways. Contractarians have avoided attempting to address an issue that seems destined to prove embarrassing for the theory given the current political climate. It is largely thought that contractarianism affirms the meager moral standing commonly attributed to most animals. In the face of this consensus, animal advocates who feel the need to philosophically ground the moral status of animals have turned to other potential sources. This is not a hard choice for animal advocates to make: utilitarianism is a respectable moral theory that affords animals moral consideration with relative ease. Nevertheless, we argue that this separation is a mistake. Contractarians can offer an account of the moral status of animals that is at least as compelling as that offered by utilitarianism. Grounding the moral worth of animals in contract theory also produces an importantly different account, one that can ground animal rights, as opposed to mere considerability, which some animal advocates will find more appealing than the utilitarian alternative



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Inclusión de animales no-humanos en un marco de argumentación teórico contractual.Daniel Loewe - 2008 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 53 (1):145-162.
Contractarianism and animal rights.Mark Rowlands - 1997 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (3):235–247.
Animal rights: moral theory and practice.Mark Rowlands - 2009 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Pure Contractarianism: Promise, Problems, Prospects.Robert Bass - 2000 - Journal of Value Inquiry 34 (2-3):319-332.
Animal rights: what everyone needs to know.Paul Waldau - 2011 - New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
Contractarianism and the assumption of mutual unconcern.Peter Vallentyne - 1989 - Philosophical Studies 56 (2):187 - 192.


Added to PP

68 (#240,864)

6 months
22 (#124,042)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Chris MacDonald
Ryerson University

References found in this work

Kant on Duties Regarding Nonrational Nature.Allen W. Wood - 1998 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):189–210.
Duties to animals: The failure of Kant's moral theory.J. Skidmore - 2001 - Journal of Value Inquiry 35 (4):541-559.
Kant on Duties Regarding Nonrational Nature.Allen W. Wood & Onora O'neill - 1998 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72:189-228.

Add more references