Reasoning and choice in the Monty Hall Dilemma : implications for improving Bayesian reasoning
Frontiers in Psychology 6 (2015)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)DOI
10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00353
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Reasoning in the monty hall problem: Examining choice behaviour and probability judgements.Ana Franco-Watkins, Peter Derks & Michael Dougherty - 2003 - Thinking and Reasoning 9 (1):67 – 90.
The Collapsing Choice Theory: Dissociating Choice and Judgment in Decision Making. [REVIEW]Jeffrey M. Stibel, Itiel E. Dror & Talia Ben-Zeev - 2009 - Theory and Decision 66 (2):149-179.
Argument diagram extraction from evidential Bayesian networks.Jeroen Keppens - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (2):109-143.
A randomised Monty Hall experiment: The positive effect of conditional frequency feedback.Lore Saenen, Wim Van Dooren & Patrick Onghena - 2015 - Thinking and Reasoning 21 (2):176-192.
Monty hall, doomsday and confirmation.Darren Bradley & Branden Fitelson - 2003 - Analysis 63 (1):23–31.
Editorial: Improving Bayesian Reasoning: What Works and Why?David R. Mandel & Gorka Navarrete - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
How to use probabilities in reasoning.John L. Pollock - 1991 - Philosophical Studies 64 (1):65 - 85.
Rationality, the Bayesian standpoint, and the Monty-Hall problem.Jean Baratgin - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Ramsey and the measurement of belief.Richard Bradley - 2001 - In David Corfield & Jon Williamson (eds.), Foundations of Bayesianism.
Practical Reasoning: Its Elements, Practicality and Validity.Rebekka Gersbach - 2015 - Münster: mentis.
A choice for 'me' or for 'us'? Using we-reasoning to predict cooperation and coordination in games.David J. Butler - 2012 - Theory and Decision 73 (1):53-76.
Institutional context and auditors' moral reasoning: A canada-u.S. Comparison. [REVIEW]Linda Thorne, Dawn W. Massey & Michel Magnan - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 43 (4):305 - 321.
The dynamics of development: Challenges for bayesian rationality.Nils Straubinger, Edward T. Cokely & Jeffrey R. Stevens - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):103-104.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-06-30
Downloads
27 (#433,402)
6 months
3 (#225,457)
2016-06-30
Downloads
27 (#433,402)
6 months
3 (#225,457)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Comprehension and computation in Bayesian problem solving.Eric D. Johnson & Elisabet Tubau - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Rationality, the Bayesian standpoint, and the Monty-Hall problem.Jean Baratgin - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Editorial: Improving Bayesian Reasoning: What Works and Why?David R. Mandel & Gorka Navarrete - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
A modified Monty Hall problem.Wei James Chen & Joseph Tao-yi Wang - 2020 - Theory and Decision 89 (2):151-156.
Tversky and Kahneman’s Cognitive Illusions: Who Can Solve Them, and Why?Georg Bruckmaier, Stefan Krauss, Karin Binder, Sven Hilbert & Martin Brunner - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 12.
References found in this work
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition Advancing the Debate.Jonathan Evans & Keith E. Stanovich - 2013 - Perspectives on Psychological Science 8 (3):223-241.
The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.Steven A. Sloman - 1996 - Psychological Bulletin 119 (1):3-22.
How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats.Gerd Gigerenzer & Ulrich Hoffrage - 1995 - Psychological Review 102 (4):684-704.
