The Importance of History for Philosophy of Psychiatry: The Case of the DSM and Psychiatric Classification

Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (3):446-470 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Abstract Recently, some philosophers of psychiatry (viz., Rachel Cooper and Dominic Murphy) have analyzed the issue of psychiatric classification. This paper expands upon these analyses and seeks to demonstrate that a consideration of the history of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) can provide a rich and informative philosophical perspective for critically examining the issue of psychiatric classification. This case is intended to demonstrate the importance of history for philosophy of psychiatry, and more generally, the potential benefits of historically-informed approaches to philosophy of science

Similar books and articles

On values in recent american psychiatric classification.J. Agich George - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (3).
The Reality and Classification of Mental Disorders.Jonathan Y. Tsou - 2008 - Dissertation, University of Chicago
What is wrong with the DSM?Rachel Cooper - 2004 - History of Psychiatry 15 (1):5-25.
Values and psychiatric diagnosis.John Z. Sadler - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Deflating Psychiatric Classification.Claudio Em Banzato - 2009 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 16 (1):23-27.
The little woman meets son of dsm-III.Karen Ritchie - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (6):695-708.
The Mechanistic Approach to Psychiatric Classification.Elisabetta Sirgiovanni - 2009 - Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 2 (2):45-49.


Added to PP

922 (#15,630)

6 months
284 (#7,914)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jonathan Y. Tsou
University of Texas at Dallas

References found in this work

Letter to the Editor.[author unknown] - 1983 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 56 (5):729-729.

Add more references