Lost Hopes and Mixed Quotes

In P. De Brabander (ed.), Hybrid Quotations. Benjamins (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The analysis of mixed quotation proposed in Cappelen & Lepore (1997), purportedly as a development of Davidson's accounts of direct and of indirect quotation, is critically examined. It is argued that the analysis fails to specify either necessary or sufficient conditions on mixed quotation, and that the way it has been defended by its proponents makes its alleged Davidsonian parentage questionable.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Varieties of Quotation.Herman Cappelen & Ernie Lepore - 1997 - Mind 106 (423):429-450.
Varieties of Quotation Revisited.Herman Cappelen & Ernie Lepore - 2003 - Belgian Journal of Linguistics (17):51-75.
Understanding Mixed Quotation.Mark McCullagh - 2007 - Mind 116 (464):927-946.
Quotation in Context.Bart Geurts & Emar Maier - 2005 - In Philippe de Brabanter (ed.), Hybrid Quotations. John Benjamins. pp. 109-28.
Quoted imperatives.Emar Maier - 2010 - In Martin Prinzhorn, Viola Schmitt & Sarah Zobel (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn Und Bedeutung 14. pp. 1-16.
The character of quotation.Chung-Chieh Shan - 2010 - Linguistics and Philosophy 33 (5):417-443.
A demonstrative analysis of 'open quotation'.Yitzhak Benbaji - 2004 - Mind and Language 19 (5):534–547.
Open quotation.François Recanati - 2001 - Mind 110 (439):637-687.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-01-26

Downloads
646 (#23,856)

6 months
59 (#64,575)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Savas L. Tsohatzidis
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (mirror)

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references