A Method for Eliciting Utilities and its Application to Collective Choice

Theory and Decision 61 (1):51-62 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Designing a mechanism that provides a direct incentive for an individual to report her utility function over several alternatives is a difficult task. A framework for such mechanism design is the following: an individual (a decision maker) is faced with an optimization problem (e.g., maximization of expected utility), and a mechanism designer observes the decision maker’s action. The mechanism does reveal the individual’s utility truthfully if the mechanism designer, having observed the decision maker’s action, infers the decision maker’s utilities over several alternatives. This paper studies an example of such a mechanism and discusses its application to the problem of optimal social choice. Under certain simplifying assumptions about individuals’ utility functions and about how voters choose their voting strategies, this mechanism selects the alternative that maximizes Harsanyi’s social utility function and is Pareto-efficient

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Invariant multiattribute utility functions.Ali E. Abbas - 2010 - Theory and Decision 68 (1-2):69-99.
Even Risk-Averters may Love Risk.Alfred Müller & Marco Scarsini - 2002 - Theory and Decision 52 (1):81-99.
New Tools for Theory Choice and Theory Diagosis.John R. Welch - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (3):318-329.
Revealed Preference and Expected Utility.Stephen A. Clark - 2000 - Theory and Decision 49 (2):159-174.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
44 (#351,926)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?