Secular and Religious Feminisms: A Future of Disconnection?

Feminist Theology 21 (3):244-258 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article identifies a disciplinary disconnection between secular and religious feminisms. While areas of study such as women’s, gender and feminist studies, and disciplines like feminist studies in religion, spirituality and theology advance understanding of gender relations, they are forms of analysis that rarely keep company. As we argue, there is a disconnection grounded in a sacred/secular divide evident through the different stages of the women’s movement and feminist history. Not only is this disciplinary disconnection mutually unhelpful, but it has implications for the ways gendered religious and secular discourses operate in the public square and therefore, has implications for the future of feminist theology. This article first identifies the lack of relationship between secular and religious feminisms illustrated in three interrelated ways: secular feminisms’ neglect of women’s religious experiences; feminist religious studies’ reservedness; and the sacred/secular binary operating in the academy. We then suggest this disconnection extends to the most recent expressions of feminism – the third wave. This article then discusses what both disciplines lose from a lack of dialogue and what might be gained by a closer relationship; particularly when contemporary events in the public sphere highlight the importance of paying attention to the way women’s experiences, and secular and religious discourses interact.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Space for Female Subjectivity in the Post-Secular?Mats Nilsson & Mekonnen Tesfahuney - 2019 - Theory, Culture and Society 36 (7-8):173-192.
Who is the Single Individual?Brayton Polka - 2005 - Philosophy and Theology 17 (1-2):157-175.
Living in an Age of Comfort: Understanding Religion in the Twenty-first Century.G. Melleuish - 2014 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2014 (166):9-24.
Reclaiming the Secular and the Religious: The Primacy of Religious Autonomy.Michael Mcconnell - 2009 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 76 (4):1333-1344.
Reclaiming the secular and the religious: The primacy of religious autonomy.Michael W. McConnell - 2009 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 76 (4):1333-1344.
In pursuit of the postsecular.Arie L. Molendijk - 2015 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 76 (2):100-115.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-25

Downloads
12 (#1,025,624)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?