Legitimacy and Importance of the Traditional Authority in Africa: K.A. Appiah's Approach and Its Critique

Africana Bulletin 58:47-74 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In many African states, numerous different pre-colonial systems of power – such as kingships, sultanates or chieftaincies – which have a traditional legitimacy often confirmed in colonial and post-colonial times, have survived till our day. Their role in the contemporary republican state has been studied by many African intellectuals, and the views of Kwame Anthony Appiah, a thinker originating from Ghana, are of particular interest. He believes that in order to understand the significance of traditional authority and the phenomenon of its continued existence in contemporary Africa, it is important to consider the source of its legitimacy. Appiah presents various sources – symbolic, religious and state – from which local African rulers derive the right to exert power and to exact obedience from their subjects. He minimizes the significance of most of these, however, and concludes that the basic source of legitimacy for traditional authority in the contemporary African state is the fact that this power, being a very important point of reference for the group over which it is wielded, reinforces its members’ sense of self-respect, and helps form their identity. He uses this idea to attempt to reconcile the continued existence of African power systems with liberal theory. Appiah, who is very unfavorably disposed towards most political and social hierarchies, views the political rights of individuals as the rights of citizens, not as the rights of persons who are the depositaries of some attributed or hereditary status. He enumerates the costs, in terms of liberal principles, of allowing traditional monarchy to persist. In his view, it is contrary to the liberal principle of public offices being open to persons of merit for the king of the Ashanti to be chosen from among persons of royal lineage. Such a perspective should generate a generally negative attitude towards the monarchy of the Ashanti, a people from whom Appiah originates, and yet he views Ashanti’s traditional monarchy as a source of pride. Published in "Africana Bulletin" 2010, No. 58, pp. 47-74.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Quandaries of Legitimacy.Bernard Matolino - 2010 - Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 57 (123):52-76.
Quandaries of Legitimacy.Bernard Matolino - 2010 - Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 57 (125):52-76.
Political legitimacy.Fabienne Peter - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Kwame Anthony Appiah—The Triumph of Liberalism.P. H. Coetzee - 2001 - Philosophical Papers 30 (3):261-287.
Institutional Legitimacy.N. P. Adams - 2018 - Journal of Political Philosophy:84-102.
Justice, Legitimacy, and (Normative) Authority for Political Realists.Enzo Rossi - 2012 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (2):149-164.
Legitimacy is Not Authority.Jon Garthoff - 2010 - Law and Philosophy 29 (6):669-694.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-13

Downloads
205 (#92,849)

6 months
78 (#52,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Krzysztof Trzcinski
Jagiellonian University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references