Journal of Business Ethics 8 (4):261 - 269 (1989)
AbstractIt is argued, against Richard T. De George, that while clarification of concepts, implications, and presuppositions in business ethics largely relies on a neutral territory of reason, determination of what moral intuitions are correct depends on non-neutral ethical theories. The latter posit ethics in business to varying degrees. Thus while the Kantian and utilitarian ethical theories are, for De George, proper (philosophical) approaches to business ethics, they are as reliant on affirming and encouraging moral sentiments outside parameters of pure reason as theological approaches. And hence if theological approaches can make no unique contribution by virtue of relying on more than reason or experience alone, then philosophical approaches can make no distinctive contribution either. Either both are viable or neither are. Oscillation between the mutually dependent notions of business ethics and ethics in business obfuscates what the field of business ethics is and renders De George's position inadequate.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
The Quest to Improve the Human Condition: The First 1 500 Articles Published in Journal of Business Ethics. [REVIEW]Denis Collins - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 26 (1):1 - 73.
Linking Management Behavior to Ethical Philosophy.Shane R. Premeaux & R. Wayne Mondy - 1993 - Journal of Business Ethics 12 (5):349 - 357.
The Sociology of Knowledge: Toward an Existential View of Business Ethics. [REVIEW]Nelson Phillips - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (10):787 - 795.
Similar books and articles
The Relevance and Value of Confucianism in Contemporary Business Ethics.Gary Kok Yew Chan - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 77 (3):347 - 360.
Umpire and Batsman: Is It Cricket to Be Both?Dennis P. McCann - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (6):445 - 451.
Theological Ethics and Business Ethics.Richard T. George - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (6):421 - 432.
Globalization and the Ethics of Business.John R. Boatright - 2000 - Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (1):1-6.
Christ and Business: A Typology for Christian Business Ethics.Louke Wensveen Sikevanr - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (11).
Christ and Business: A Typology for Christian Business Ethics. [REVIEW]Louke van Wensveen Siker - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (11):883 - 888.
A Framework for Teaching Business Ethics.Alfonso R. Oddo - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (3):293-297.
Patterns of Argument in Business Ethics.David P. Schmidt - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (6):501 - 509.
Why Be Moral in Business? A Rawlsian Approach to Moral Motivation.Richard H. Toenjes - 2002 - Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (1):57-72.
The Religious Nature of Practical Reason: A Way Into the Debate. [REVIEW]David A. Krueger - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (6):511 - 519.