Is It Time to Abandon Brain Death?

Hastings Center Report 27 (1):29-37 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Despite its familiarity and widespread acceptance, the concept of “brain death” remains incoherent in theory and confused in practice. Moreover, the only purpose served by the concept is to facilitate the procurement of transplantable organs. By abandoning the concept of brain death and adopting different criteria for organ procurement, we may be able to increase both the supply of transplantable organs and clarity in our understanding of death.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Brain Death - Too Flawed to Endure, Too Ingrained to Abandon.Robert D. Truog - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (2):273-281.
Brain death without definitions.Winston Chiong - 2005 - Hastings Center Report 35 (6):20-30.
Brain Death and the Catholic Church.Kevin McGovern - 2008 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 14 (1):6.
Time, the familiar stranger.Julius Thomas Fraser - 1987 - Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Current debate on the ethical issues of brain death.Masahiro Morioka - 2004 - Proceedings of International Congress on Ethical Issues in Brain Death and Organ Transplantation:57-59.
Epistemology of brain death determination.Douglas N. Walton - 1981 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2 (3):259-274.
Death and philosophy.Jeff Malpas & Robert C. Solomon (eds.) - 1998 - New York: Routledge.
Reviving Brain Death: A Functionalist View. [REVIEW]Samuel H. LiPuma & Joseph P. DeMarco - 2013 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (3):383-392.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-30

Downloads
89 (#187,106)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?