Behinderung und Gesellschaft neu zusammen denken?!: Über die Begrenzungen sozio-kulturell überakzentuierter Behinderungsmodelle hinweg zu sozialen und ökologischen Zukunftsthemen nachhaltig gerechter Gesellschaften

TextTräger (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In recent history, the Social Model has crucially contributed to an emancipatory perspective on disability, not least as a rebuttal to deficit oriented views focused on suffering. Several overstated notions of “social construction“ this family of models relies on, however, presently threaten to unduly narrow reflections on “disability”-situations and the self-reflection of disabled people. These notions tend to obscure social and ecological issues an emerging just social order will need to address. The roots of any sociocultural formation in external (physical) reality thus remain underrecognised. This paper adumbrates an alternative approach rooted in (External) Realism. The argument is based on a critique of social constructivist notions employed in models of disability overemphasising sociocultural elements, and capitalises on work by T. Shakespeare and S. Vehmas.. Implications of the proposed approach for debates on 1.) social issues and issues of human(e) interaction, especially personal assistance- relationships and 2.) ecological issues and human dealings with nature, are briefly explored. (Paper in German, long version with examples from two domains and additional explanations. Originally presented at DisKo18.)

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is there a coherent social conception of disability?J. Harris - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (2):95-100.
Disability: a welfarist approach.Julian Savulescu & Guy Kahane - 2011 - Clinical Ethics 6 (1):45-51.
Catholic Social Teaching and Ecology.Russell Butkus & Steven Kolmes - 2007 - Journal of Catholic Social Thought 4 (2):203-209.
On valuing impairment.Dana Howard & Sean Aas - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (5):1113-1133.
Disability: getting it "right".C. Thomas - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (1):15-17.
Disability Studies Gets Fat.Anna Mollow - 2015 - Hypatia 30 (1):199-216.
Mothers and Models of Disability.Gail Landsman - 2005 - Journal of Medical Humanities 26 (2-3):121-139.
Disability rights and wrongs. [REVIEW]S. D. Edwards - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (3):222-222.
Philosophical and Ethical Issues in Disability.Jeffrey Blustein - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (4):573-587.
Defining disability: metaphysical not political.Christopher A. Riddle - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (3):377-384.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-27

Downloads
265 (#72,807)

6 months
57 (#72,811)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christoph P. Trueper
Goethe University Frankfurt

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references