Wondrous Truths: The Improbable Triumph of Modern Science

New York, US: Oxford University Press USA (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A fresh, daring, and genuine alternative to the traditional story of scientific progress Explaining the world around us, and the life within it, is one of the most uniquely human drives, and the most celebrated activity of science. Good explanations are what provide accurate causal accounts of the things we wonder at, but explanation's earthly origins haven't grounded it: we have used it to account for the grandest and most wondrous mysteries in the natural world. Explanations give us a sense of understanding, but an explanation that feels right doesn't mean it is true. For every true explanation, there is a false one that feels just as good. A good theory's explanations, though, have a much easier path to truth. This push for good explanations elevated science from medieval alchemy to electro-chemistry, or a pre-inertial physics to the forces underlying nanoparticles. And though the attempt to explain has existed as long as we have been able to wonder, a science timeline from pre-history to the present will reveal a steep curve of theoretical discovery that explodes around 1600, primarily in the West. Ranging over neuroscience, psychology, history, and policy, Wondrous Truths answers two fundamental questions-Why did science progress in the West? And why so quickly? J.D. Trout's answers are surprising. His central idea is that Western science rose above all others because it hit upon successive theories that were approximately true through an awkward assortment of accident and luck, geography and personal idiosyncrasy. Of course, intellectual ingenuity partially accounts for this persistent drive forward. But so too does the persistence of the objects of wonder. Wondrous Truths recovers the majesty of science, and provides a startling new look at the grand sweep of its biggest ideas.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Scientific explanation and the sense of understanding.J. D. Trout - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (2):212-233.
The Esthetics of Science and the Science of Esthetics.M. V. Vol'kenshtein - 1977 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 16 (1):13-25.
A Coherentist View of Theory Acceptance and Change.Mohamed Mahmoud Elsamahi - 1996 - Dissertation, University of Calgary (Canada)
An Inquiry Into Theories of Scientific Explanation.Sharon Loretta Labrot - 1980 - Dissertation, University of Southern California
A defense of a unificationist theory of explanation.Rebecca Schweder - 2005 - Foundations of Science 10 (4):421-435.
Why the ultimate argument for scientific realism ultimately fails.Moti Mizrahi - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):132-138.
Understanding science: Why causes are not enough.Ruth Berger - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (2):306-332.
Terra incognita: Explanation and reduction in earth science.Maarten G. Kleinhans, Chris J. J. Buskes & Henk W. de Regt - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (3):289 – 317.
The Structure of Explanation in Cognitive Science.Brian Beakley - 1992 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook
Science without laws.Ronald N. Giere - 1999 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Court and controversy: patenting science in the nineteenth century.Paul Lucier - 1996 - British Journal for the History of Science 29 (2):139-154.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-27

Downloads
30 (#521,181)

6 months
5 (#638,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

J. D. Trout
Loyola University, Chicago

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references