Why bioethics is ill equipped to contribute to the debate about prolonging lifespans

HEC Forum 16 (3):197-213 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Feminist bioethics: At the center, on the margins. [REVIEW]Robyn Bluhm - 2011 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 4 (2):154-159.
Why philosophers should offer ethics consultations.David C. Thomasma - 1991 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (2).
How can psychology contribute to the free will debate?Shaun Nichols - 2009 - In J. Baer, J. Kaufman & R. Baumeister (eds.), Psychology and Free Will. Oxford University Press.
Life-prolonging killings and their relevance to ethics.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 1999 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (2):135-147.
Can Bioethics Be Evangelical?Dennis Hollinger - 1989 - Journal of Religious Ethics 17 (2):161-179.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
71 (#226,964)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Democracy and Disagreement.Amy Gutmann & Dennis Thompson - 1996 - Ethics 108 (3):607-610.
The philosophy of loyalty.Josiah Royce - 1908 - New York,: Hafner Pub. Co..
Theories of everything: the quest for ultimate explanation.John D. Barrow - 1991 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by John D. Barrow.

View all 16 references / Add more references