- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
What you see is what you need
Journal of Vision 3 (1):86-94 (2003)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
You Can’t Always Get What You Want… We Will Help You Get What You Need.Lucia D. Wocial - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (1):65-67.
What you see isn't always what you know.John Eliot - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (1):80-81.
What you see is what you want to see: Motivationally relevant stimuli can interrupt current resource allocation.Eugene McSorley & Jayne Morriss - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 31 (1):168-174.
What you see is what you get: webcam placement influences perception and social coordination.Laura E. Thomas & Daniel Pemstein - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
See What You Believe, Become What You See.Joanna Bowen - 2021 - Praxis: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Faith and Justice 4:13-15.
What you see is what you set: Sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness.Steven B. Most, Brian J. Scholl, Erin R. Clifford & Daniel J. Simons - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (1):217-242.
What you learn is more than what you see: what can sequencing effects tell us about inductive category learning?Paulo F. Carvalho & Robert L. Goldstone - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
An Empathic Eye.Dominic McIver Lopes - 2011 - In Amy Coplan & Peter Goldie (eds.), Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 118-133.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
93 (#196,167)
6 months
13 (#193,282)
2009-01-28
Downloads
93 (#196,167)
6 months
13 (#193,282)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Rich or thin?Susanna Siegel & Alex Byrne - 2016 - In Bence Nanay (ed.), Current Controversies in Philosophy of Perception. New York: Routledge. pp. 59-80.
Inference Without Reckoning.Susanna Siegel - 2019 - In Magdalena Balcerak Jackson & Brendan Jackson (eds.), Reasoning: New Essays on Theoretical and Practical Thinking. Oxford University Press. pp. 15-31.
How Is Wishful Seeing Like Wishful Thinking?Susanna Siegel - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 95 (2):408-435.
Change Blindness.Ronald A. Rensink - 2005 - In Laurent Itti, Geraint Rees & John K. Tsotsos (eds.), Neurobiology of Attention. Academic Press. pp. 76--81.
References found in this work
To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes.Ronald A. Rensink, J. Kevin O'Regan & James J. Clark - 1997 - Psychological Science 8:368-373.
Change blindness.Daniel J. Simons & Daniel T. Levin - 1997 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1 (1):241-82.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5d8df9484f-9zwsp uwo