Continental Philosophy Review 49 (2):203-221 (2016)

Authors
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to examine Merleau-Ponty’s idea of a “psychoanalysis of Nature”. My thesis is that in order to understand the creation of a Merleau-Pontean psychoanalysis, we need to ultimately understand the place of Schelling in Merleau-Ponty’s late thought. Through his dialogue with Schelling, Merleau-Ponty will be able to formulate not only a psychoanalysis of Nature, but also fulfil the ultimate task of phenomenology itself; namely, of identifying “what resists phenomenology—natural being, the ‘barbarous’ source Schelling spoke of” and situating it precisely at the heart of phenomenology. The plan for studying this natural psychoanalysis is threefold. First, I provide an overview of the role psychoanalysis plays in the 1951 lecture, “Man and Adversity,” focusing especially on this lecture as a turning point in his thinking. Second, I chart how Merleau-Ponty’s psychoanalysis is informed by the various ways in which the unconscious is formulated in his thought, leading eventually to a dialogue with Schelling. Accordingly, in the final part of the paper, I trace the role of Schelling’s thought in the creation of a Merleau-Pontean psychoanalysis. As I argue, what distinguishes this psychoanalysis is the centrality of Schelling’s idea of the “barbaric principle,” which manifests itself as the notion of an unconscious indexing an “excess of Being” resistant to classical phenomenology.
Keywords Nature  Psychoanalysis  Merleau-Ponty  Schelling  Unconsciousness
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11007-016-9374-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,130
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Signs.Maurice Merleau-Ponty - 2018 - Chiasmi International 20:231-231.
The Visible and the Invisible.B. Falk - 1970 - Philosophical Quarterly 20 (80):278-279.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

On the Role of Depersonalization in Merleau-Ponty.Dylan Trigg - 2017 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 16 (2):275-289.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On the Role of Depersonalization in Merleau-Ponty.Dylan Trigg - 2017 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 16 (2):275-289.
Phenomenology, Psychology, and Science, II.Keith Hoeller - 1982 - Rev Exist Psych Psychiat 18:143-154.
Image and Ontology in Merleau-Ponty.Trevor Perri - 2013 - Continental Philosophy Review 46 (1):75-97.
Merleau‐Ponty and the Phenomenological Reduction.Joel Smith - 2005 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 48 (6):553-571.
Lived Body and Fantasmatic Body: The Debate Between Phenomenology and Psychoanalysis.Thamy Ayouch - 2008 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 28 (2):336-355.
Body.David Morris - 2008 - In Rosalyn Diprose & Jack Reynolds (eds.), Merleau-ponty: Key Concepts. Acumen Publishing. pp. 111-120.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-04-14

Total views
37 ( #307,070 of 2,506,474 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,791 of 2,506,474 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes