Correction to: The Opportunity Cost of Negative Screening in Socially Responsible Investing

Journal of Business Ethics 147 (1):239-240 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Table 3 of Trinks, P. J., Scholtens, B., 2017. The Opportunity Cost of Negative Screening in Socially Responsible Investing. Journal of Business Ethics, 140, 193–208, reports the four-factor return performance of long–short sin stock portfolios and sin stock-free portfolios.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A History of Scandinavian Socially Responsible Investing.Elias Bengtsson - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 82 (4):969-983.
Socially Responsible Investing: A Critical Appraisal. [REVIEW]D. Bruce Johnsen - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 43 (3):219 - 222.
Sovereign Bonds and Socially Responsible Investment.Bastien Drut - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 92 (S1):131 - 145.
Socially Responsible Investing in the United States.Steve Schueth - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 43 (3):189 - 194.
Social Investing: Mainstream or Backwater? [REVIEW]Thomas W. Dunfee - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 43 (3):247 - 252.
Socially Responsible Investing: Is Your Fiduciary Duty at Risk?William Martin - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 90 (4):549-560.
Does it Really Hurt to be Responsible?Jacquelyn E. Humphrey & David T. Tan - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 122 (3):375-386.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-10

Downloads
22 (#669,532)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references