The Polemical Employment of Pure Reason and Kantian Ethics

Philosophy Research Archives 14:183-192 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

From the earliest days of philosophy, polemic has functioned as a common means of philosophical argumentation. Kant spends some time in the Critique of Pure Reason analyzing the place of polemic in rational argumentation. Even though it does not provide a legitimate approach to philosophical argument as employed by the dogmatists, Kant’s concern for the teaching of the young allows him to raise some issues concerning the ethics of philosophical argumentation also.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Normative Source of Kantian Hypothetical Imperatives.Camillia Kong - 2012 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (5):661-690.
Intuition and Immediacy in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason.Andrew Kelley - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22:289-298.
Critique of pure reason.Immanuel Kant - 1781/1998 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Blackwell. pp. 449-451.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
47 (#323,378)

6 months
11 (#196,102)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Dissatisfied Skeptic in Kant's Discipline of Pure Reason.Charles Goldhaber - 2023 - Journal of Transcendental Philosophy 4 (2):157-177.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references