Frederic Tremblay
University at Buffalo (PhD)
The twentieth century Russian philosopher Nikolai Lossky was one of the earliest and most important proponents—but also critics—of Bergson’s philosophy in Russia at a time when many Russian philosophers were preoccupied with the same complex of philosophical questions and answers that Bergson was addressing. Thus, if only from the standpoint of intellectual history, Lossky is central to the study of the reception of Bergson in Russia. In this article, I present the principal historical links, points of agreement between Bergson and Lossky, such as their respective anti-Kantianism, intuitivism, ontological realism, vitalism, organicism, Neo-Platonism, as well as their points of disagreement, including some of Lossky’s key criticisms of Bergson, with special emphasis on the issues of intuition, ideal being, substance and change, time, and sensible qualities. This paper is meant as an introduction to the translations of Lossky’s “Heдocтaтки гнoceoлoгiи Бepгcoнa и влiянie иxъ нa eгo мeтaфизикy” (The Defects of Bergson’s Epistemology and Their Consequences on His Metaphysics) (1913) and his review of Bergson’s, Les deux sources de la morale et de la religion (1932), which are published in the present issue of Studies in East European Thought.
Keywords Russian Philosophy  History of Russian Philosophy  Eastern European Philosophy  French Philosophy  Metaphysics and Epistemology  Henri Bergson  Nikolai Lossky
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11212-017-9275-z
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,526
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

L'evolution Creatrice.B. H. Bode & Henri Bergson - 1908 - Philosophical Review 17 (1):84.
Neoplatonic Tendencies in Russian Philosophy.Janusz Dobieszewski - 2010 - Studies in East European Thought 62 (1):3 - 10.
Mysl' and the Intuitivist Debate in the Early 1920s.Frances Nethercott - 1991 - Studies in East European Thought 41 (3):207-224.
Le paralogisme psycho-physiologique.H. Bergson - 1904 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 12 (6):895 - 908.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Henri Bergson.Vladimir Jankélévitch, Nils F. Schott & Alexandre Lefebvre (eds.) - 2015 - Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Henri Bergson na cestě ke skutečnému času.Jakub Čapek - 2002 - Filosoficky Casopis 50:228-248.
Wilm's Henri Bergson; Ruhe's and Paul's Henri Bergson.Arthur Mitchell - 1915 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 12 (16):443.
Henri Bergson; The Philosophy of Change.Herbert Wildon Carr - 1912 - Port Washington, N.Y., Kennikat Press.


Added to PP index

Total views
42 ( #259,932 of 2,461,119 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #178,452 of 2,461,119 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes