Historical Introduction to Nicolai Hartmann’s Concept of Possibility

Axiomathes 27 (2):193-207 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his article “The Megarian and Aristotelian Concept of Possibility”, Nicolai Hartmann attempts to revive an interpretation of the conception of possibility of the Megarians that stood in opposition to the Aristotelian conception of possibility and thus in opposition to the Aristotelian conception of modality in general. In this introduction, I undertake to situate Hartmann’s article in its historical context. Did Hartmann come to adopt this thesis through his study of ancient Greek philosophy? Or did he already have a predilection for the Megarian conception of possibility prior to this? If so, how did this predilection come about? Was there an influence from his friend Vasily Sesemann, who published an article discussing the Megarians the previous year? Or were both Hartmann and Sesemann influenced early on by their mutual Russian teacher Nikolai Lossky, or even by a general tendency pervading Russian thought—itself grounded in the fatalism typical of the Russian collective unconscious—as we find it expressed in the philosophy of Vladimir Solovyov, Lev Tolstoy, and other Russian thinkers?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Cicovacki's Introduction to Nicolai Hartmann's Philosophy. [REVIEW]Frederic Tremblay - 2014 - Quaestio: Yearbook of the History of Metaphysics 14:348-.
Nicolai Hartmann's Definition of Biological Species.Frederic Tremblay - 2011 - In Roberto Poli, Carlo Scognamiglio & Frederic Tremblay (eds.), The Philosophy of Nicolai Hartmann. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 125--139.
3. Nicolai Hartmann’s Concept of Causality.Kari Väyrynen - 2016 - In Keith R. Peterson & Roberto Poli (eds.), New Research on the Philosophy of Nicolai Hartmann. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter. pp. 45-64.
Nicolai Hartmann's criticism of Kant's theory of knowledge.Lewis White Beck - 1941 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 2 (4):472-500.
Nicolai Hartmann's Plato. A Tribute to the “Power of Dialectics”(Parmenides, 135c 2).Claudia Luchetti - 2011 - In Roberto Poli, Carlo Scognamiglio & Frederic Tremblay (eds.), The Philosophy of Nicolai Hartmann. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 221.
Between Ontology and the Theory of Objects: Nicolai Hartmann and Hans Pichler.Giuseppe D'Anna - 2011 - In Roberto Poli, Carlo Scognamiglio & Frederic Tremblay (eds.), The Philosophy of Nicolai Hartmann. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 253.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-15

Downloads
21 (#715,461)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frederic Tremblay
University at Buffalo (PhD)

Citations of this work

The Limits of Modal Knowledge.Rehan P. Visser - 2019 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 23 (2):323-343.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On the Plurality of Worlds.David K. Lewis - 1986 - Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (3):388-390.
On The Plurality of Worlds.Graeme Forbes - 1988 - Philosophical Quarterly 38 (151):222-240.
Zur grundlegung der ontologie.Nicolai Hartmann (ed.) - 1935 - Berlin und Leipzig,: W. de Gruyter & co..

View all 38 references / Add more references