The Relevance of Auxiliary Assumptions in Falsification

American Journal of Bioethics 12 (12):22-24 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No abstract

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Contextual falsification and scientific methodology.Jarrett Leplin - 1972 - Philosophy of Science 39 (4):476-490.
Systems, inquiry, and the meanings of falsification.Ian I. Mitroff - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 40 (2):255-276.
Testability and candor.Sherrilyn Roush - 2005 - Synthese 145 (2):233 - 275.
Conceptual Equivocation and Warrant by Reasoning.Mikkel Gerken - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):381-400.
Toward a Historical Meta-Method for Assessing Normative Methodologies: Rationability, Serendipity, and the Robinson Crusoe Fallacy.Stephen J. Wykstra - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:211 - 222.
Falsificationism falsified.Sven Ove Hansson - 2006 - Foundations of Science 11 (3):275-286.
The bayesian treatment of auxiliary hypotheses.Michael Strevens - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (3):515-537.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-12-07

Downloads
17 (#742,076)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The logic of scientific discovery.Karl Raimund Popper - 1934 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Hutchinson Publishing Group.
The methodology of scientific research programmes.Imre Lakatos - 1978 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.Karl Popper - 1959 - Studia Logica 9:262-265.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.K. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):55-57.
The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers.Imre Lakatos, John Worrall & Gregory Currie - 1979 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (4):381-402.

View all 9 references / Add more references