The Public Understanding of Science Effort: A Critique

Science, Technology, and Human Values 6 (3):10-15 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Does Public Understanding of Science Really Mean?Leon E. Trachtman - 1989 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 9 (6):369-373.
The Public Understanding of Science—A Rhetorical Invention.Simon Locke - 2002 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 27 (1):87-111.
Science today: problem or crisis?Ralph Levinson & Jeff Thomas (eds.) - 1997 - New York: Routledge.
Why scientists should cooperate with journalists.Boyce Rensberger - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):549-552.
Feyerabend, Science, and Scientism.Ian James Kidd - 2021 - In Karim Bschir & Jamie Shaw (eds.), Interpreting Feyerabend: Critical Essays. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. pp. 172-190.
Public Understanding of Science.John Ziman - 1991 - Science, Technology and Human Values 16 (1):99-105.
Numbering the mind: Questionnaires and the attitudinal public.Jacy L. Young - 2017 - History of the Human Sciences 30 (4):32-53.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-27

Downloads
2 (#1,755,150)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What Does Public Understanding of Science Really Mean?Leon E. Trachtman - 1989 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 9 (6):369-373.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references