Polish Psychological Bulletin 48 (3):401-410 (2017)

Abstract
The anchoring heuristic refers to phenomena when an arbitrary number affects subsequent numerical estimations. Oppenheimer, LeBoeuf and Brewer showed that it is not necessary for the anchor to be a numerical value, yet current models describing the anchoring heuristic do not fully account for the mechanism of non-numerical anchoring. However, this effect shows similarity to the basic anchoring effect - obtained without the comparative question and based on the availability of the given number in working memory. In this study, we attempt to verify whether those two effect share the same psychological mechanism. In Experiment 1, we show that non-numerical anchoring based on magnitude priming cannot be obtained when the lines are just observed. The examined mechanism proves to be dependent on the act of drawing, displaying limitations similar to the basic anchoring effect, previously pointed out by Brewer and Chapman. By using the same numerical anchors in different size formats, in Experiment 2 we showed that anchoring based on magnitude priming occurs even when the numerical values do not affect the estimations. The results are discussed in the light of a possible mechanism that underlies the investigated effect.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1515/ppb-2017-0046
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,975
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Six Views of Embodied Cognition.Margaret Wilson - 2002 - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9 (4):625--636.
The Mental Representation of Parity and Number Magnitude.Stanislas Dehaene, Serge Bossini & Pascal Giraux - 1993 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 122 (3):371.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Laterality Effect: Myth or Truth?☆.Roi Cohen Kadosh - 2008 - Consciousness and Cognition 17 (1):350-354.
The Laterality Effect: Myth or Truth? ☆.Roi Kadosh - 2008 - Consciousness and Cognition 17 (1):350-354.
Anchoring Heuristic.Marko Bokulić & Darko Polšek - 2010 - Prolegomena 9 (1):71-95.
Use of Heuristics: Insights From Forecasting Research.Nigel Harvey - 2007 - Thinking and Reasoning 13 (1):5 – 24.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-12-21

Total views
5 ( #1,198,603 of 2,498,179 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #427,476 of 2,498,179 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes