Poetic Emotion versus Truth: Russell’s Preference for Spinoza over Locke

Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 30 (1) (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article explores why Russell believed Spinoza to be a superior philosopher to Locke. The latter’s empiricism is closer to Russell’s epistemology than the former’s rationalism, and the superiority of the former’s metaphysic is dubious at best. This makes for an intriguing choice. Normative ethics is the most likely basis, but Russell did not believe that this area of inquiry should be considered part of philosophy.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Emotion, Appetition, and Conatus in Spinoza.Lee C. Rice - 1977 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 31 (1):101--116.
Heine’s Spinoza.Willi Goetschel - 2003 - Idealistic Studies 33 (2/3):203-217.
The Trouble with Poetic Licence.Michel-Antoine Xhignesse - 2016 - British Journal of Aesthetics 56 (2):149-161.
Russell's Pennsylvania.Chad Trainer - 2004 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 24 (1).
Locke on competing miracles.Travis Dumsday - 2008 - Faith and Philosophy 25 (4):416-424.
True emotions.Mikko Salmela - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (224):382-405.
Review: Emotional Truth, Ronald de Sousa. [REVIEW]Hichem Naar - 2011 - Metapsychology Online Reviews:xx-yy.
Spinoza on Friendship.Frank Lucash - 2012 - Philosophia 40 (2):305-317.


Added to PP

4 (#1,238,862)

6 months
1 (#448,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Russell to Lady Ottoline Morrell: the Letters of Transformation.Andrew Brink - 2001 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 21.

Add more references