- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Korn and Freidlin's Misunderstanding of the Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Procedure
American Journal of Bioethics 11 (3):15-16 (2011)
Abstract
(2011). Korn and Freidlin's Misunderstanding of the Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Procedure. The American Journal of Bioethics: Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 15-16My notes
Similar books and articles
The logic of Null hypothesis testing.Edward Erwin - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):197-198.
The Null-hypothesis significance-test procedure: Can't live with it, can't live without it.Charles F. Blaich - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):194-195.
Chow's defense of Null-hypothesis testing: Too traditional?Robert W. Frick - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):199-199.
The quantitative-qualitative distinction and the Null hypothesis significance testing procedure.Nimal Ratnesar & Jim Mackenzie - 2006 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 40 (4):501–509.
Statistical significance testing, hypothetico-deductive method, and theory evaluation.Brian D. Haig - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):292-293.
Meta-analysis, power analysis, and the Null-hypothesis significance-test procedure.Joseph S. Rossi - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):216-217.
Null-hypothesis tests are not completely stupid, but bayesian statistics are better.David Rindskopf - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):215-216.
Testing a precise null hypothesis: the case of Lindley’s paradox.Jan Sprenger - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (5):733-744.
Significance testing – does it need this defence?Günther Palm - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):214-215.
The historical case against Null-hypothesis significance testing.Henderikus J. Stam & Grant A. Pasay - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):219-220.
A viable alternative to Null-hypothesis testing.Bruno D. Zumbo - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):227-228.
Problems With Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST): What Do the Textbooks Say?George A. Morgan - unknown
Costs and benefits of statistical significance tests.Michael G. Shafto - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):218-219.
The Null-hypothesis significance-test procedure is still warranted.Siu L. Chow - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):228-235.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-03-12
Downloads
36 (#432,773)
6 months
3 (#992,474)
2011-03-12
Downloads
36 (#432,773)
6 months
3 (#992,474)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Why I Do Not Agree That Neurointervention Is Less Ethical Than Incarceration.David Trafimow - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):144-146.
References found in this work
Hypothesis testing and theory evaluation at the boundaries: Surprising insights from Bayes's theorem.David Trafimow - 2003 - Psychological Review 110 (3):526-535.
Inefficacy Interim Monitoring Procedures in Randomized Clinical Trials: The Need to Report.Boris Freidlin & Edward L. Korn - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (3):2-10.
The ubiquitous Laplacian assumption: Reply to Lee and Wagenmakers (2005).David Trafimow - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (3):669-674.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-5tf24 uwo