Tom Huhn, Imitation and Society: The Persistence of Mimesis in the Aesthetics of Burke, Hogarth, and Kant Reviewed by [Book Review]

Philosophy in Review 25 (1):31-33 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Imitation and Society. [REVIEW]Gabriel Gottlieb - 2006 - Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 27 (1):210-214.
Mimikry: gefährlicher Luxus zwischen Natur und Kultur.Andreas Becker (ed.) - 2008 - Schliengen im Markgräflerland: Edition Argus.
Kant’s imitatio Christi.Daniel Whistler - 2010 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 67 (1):17 - 36.
Mimesis and art.Göran Sörbom - 1966 - Stockholm,: Svenska bokförlaget (Bonnier).
Active Mimesis and the Art of History of Philosophy.Robert Piercey - 2003 - International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (1):29-42.
A lack of feeling in Kant: Response to Patricia M. Matthews.Tom Huhn - 1997 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55 (1):57-58.
Aristotle's Mimesis and Abstract Art.Garry Hagberg - 1984 - Philosophy 59 (229):365 - 371.
Heidegger, Adorno, and Mimesis.Tom Huhn - 2003 - Dialogue and Universalism 13 (11-12):43-52.
Mimesis as a phenomenon of semiotic communication.Timo Maran - 2003 - Sign Systems Studies 31 (1):191-215.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-14

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references