An accuracy–response time capacity assessment function that measures performance against standard parallel predictions

&
Psychological Review 119 (3):500-516 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/a0028448

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A Theory of Interactive Parallel Processing: New Capacity Measures and Predictions for a Response Time Inequality Series.James T. Townsend & Michael J. Wenger - 2004 - Psychological Review 111 (4):1003-1035.
The limits of objective assessment of medical practice.Thomas S. Huddle - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (6):487-496.
Information capacity of discrete motor responses.Paul M. Fitts & James R. Peterson - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (2):103.
Evolutionary efficiency and happiness.Gary Becker - manuscript
Accuracy-based measures provide a better measure of sequence learning than reaction time-based measures.Kristi Urry, Nicholas R. Burns & Irina Baetu - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Performance predictions affect attentional processes of event-based prospective memory.Jan Rummel, Beatrice G. Kuhlmann & Dayna R. Touron - 2013 - Consciousness and Cognition 22 (3):729-741.
Grain packing in early standard capacity measures: Evidence from the scottish dry capacity standards.A. D. C. Simpson - 1992 - Annals of Science 49 (4):337-350.
The relationship between general intellectual ability and performance on ecologically valid executive tests in a sever brain injury sample.R. Ll Wood & Christina Liossi - unknown
Problems in Measuring the Reliability of National Curriculum Assessment in England and Wales.I. P. Schagen - 1993 - Educational Studies 19 (1):41-54.
How Accurate Is the Standard Second?Eran Tal - 2011 - Philosophy of Science 78 (5):1082-1096.
It’s not fair! Or is it? The promise and the tyranny of evidence-based performance assessment.Elizabeth Bogdan-Lovis, Leonard Fleck & Henry C. Barry - 2012 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (4):293-311.
Information processing as a function of speed versus accuracy.James M. Swanson & George E. Briggs - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (2):223.
Methodological and substantive implications of a metatheoretical distinction: More on correspondence versus storehouse metaphors of memory.Asher Koriat & Morris Goldsmith - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):165-168.
A Phase Transition Model for the Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off in Response Time Experiments.Gilles Dutilh, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Ingmar Visser & Han L. J. van der Maas - 2011 - Cognitive Science 35 (2):211-250.
An Extension of a Parallel‐Distributed Processing Framework of Reading Aloud in Japanese: Human Nonword Reading Accuracy Does Not Require a Sequential Mechanism.Kenji Ikeda, Taiji Ueno, Yuichi Ito, Shinji Kitagami & Jun Kawaguchi - 2017 - Cognitive Science 41 (S6):1288-1317.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
5 (#1,432,111)

6 months
2 (#1,015,942)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references