The impact of reporting magnetic resonance imaging incidental findings in the Canadian alliance for healthy hearts and minds cohort

BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-15 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

BackgroundIn the Canadian Alliance for Healthy Hearts and Minds (CAHHM) cohort, participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, heart, and abdomen, that generated incidental findings (IFs). The approach to managing these unexpected results remain a complex issue. Our objectives were to describe the CAHHM policy for the management of IFs, to understand the impact of disclosing IFs to healthy research participants, and to reflect on the ethical obligations of researchers in future MRI studies.MethodsBetween 2013 and 2019, 8252 participants (mean age 58 ± 9 years, 54% women) were recruited with a follow-up questionnaire administered to 909 participants (40% response rate) at 1-year. The CAHHM policy followed a restricted approach, whereby routine feedback on IFs was not provided. Only IFs of severe structural abnormalities were reported.ResultsSevere structural abnormalities occurred in 8.3% (95% confidence interval 7.7–8.9%) of participants, with the highest proportions found in the brain (4.2%) and abdomen (3.1%). The majority of participants (97%) informed of an IF reported no change in quality of life, with 3% of participants reporting that the knowledge of an IF negatively impacted their quality of life. Furthermore, 50% reported increased stress in learning about an IF, and in 95%, the discovery of an IF did not adversely impact his/her life insurance policy. Most participants (90%) would enrol in the study again and perceived the MRI scan to be beneficial, regardless of whether they were informed of IFs. While the implications of a restricted approach to IF management was perceived to be mostly positive, a degree of diagnostic misconception was present amongst participants, indicating the importance of a more thorough consent process to support participant autonomy.ConclusionThe management of IFs from research MRI scans remain a challenging issue, as participants may experience stress and a reduced quality of life when IFs are disclosed. The restricted approach to IF management in CAHHM demonstrated a fair fulfillment of the overarching ethical principles of respect for autonomy, concern for wellbeing, and justice. The approach outlined in the CAHHM policy may serve as a framework for future research studies.Clinical trial registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/nct02220582.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,659

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Guillermo de ockham Y el nacimiento Del laicismo moderno.Nicolás López Calera - 2012 - Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 46:263-280.
Neocons Y teocons: Fundamentalismo versus democracia.Elías Díaz Cintas - 2010 - Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 44:61-79.
Prueba científica: Mitos Y paradigmas.Marina Gascón Abellán - 2010 - Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 44:81-103.
Para Una refundación epistemológica de la teoría Del derecho.Luigi Ferrajoli - 2010 - Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 44:417-434.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-10-29

Downloads
70 (#231,140)

6 months
54 (#98,683)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Alex Casanova
Arizona State University
Fernanda Henriques
Universidade de Évora (PhD)
8 more

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

View all 7 references / Add more references