The importance of microevolutionary tenets in the debate on germ-line human gene theraphy

Ludus Vitalis 2 (3):137-150 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Germ-Line Gene Therapy Could Prove a Two-Edged Tool.A. Sutton - 2012 - Christian Bioethics 18 (2):145-155.
Debunking the slippery slope argument against human germ-line Gene therapy.David Resnik - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (1):23-40.
Should we change the human genome?Torbjörn Tännsjö - 1993 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (3).
Germ-line enhancement of humans and nonhumans.J. Robert Loftis - 2005 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (1):57-76.
Genetic Disorders and the Ethical Status of Germ-Line Gene Therapy.E. M. Berger & B. M. Gert - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (6):667-683.
Human gene therapy and slippery slope arguments.T. McGleenan - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (6):350-355.
Germ-line Gene Therapy: A New Stage of Debate.John C. Fletcher & W. French Anderson - 1992 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 20 (1-2):26-39.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
1 (#1,866,476)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references