Intertextuality as an Integral Component of the Modern Ukrainian Discourse

Postmodern Openings 12 (4):255-271 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article highlights the impact of globalization processes on formation of dominant worldviews and guidelines, as well as ways and means of representing the latter. The state and prospects of studying intertextuality as an important element of modern world discourses in the projection on the national cultural background are studied. Attention is drawn to the high degree of development of both theoretical and applied aspects of intertextuality of discourses by representatives of academic communities of different countries and fields of knowledge, which gave grounds to establish the polydiscursive and interdiscursive nature of the object of analysis. Orientation of domestic experts on parameterization of mainly specific manifestations of intertextuality within certain discourses at the level of isolated intertexts and presence of gaps in the theoretical description of the phenomenon in the context of national specificity is stated. Emphasis is placed on the definite variability of the terminology due to the interdisciplinary nature of discursiveness and, accordingly, intertextuality. A complementary link has been established between postmodernism as the dominant philosophical worldview and the intertextuality of discourses. The specifics of the intertextuality of contemporary Ukrainian literary discourse with regard to various scientific studies are clarified. The concept of “intertextual memory” is introduced and justification of its use is given. The need to apply the term “postmodern intertextuality” in relation to contemporary literary discourse is considered. The common and distinctive features of the manifestation of intertextuality in literary and journalistic discourses are traced. The specifics of intertextuality of Ukrainian journalistic discourse are described. It is established that the precedent character of the communicative act is of exceptional importance for realization of intertextuality in journalistic discourse.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Against intertextuality.William Irwin - 2004 - Philosophy and Literature 28 (2):227-242.
Rethinking intertextuality in CDA.Michael Farrelly - 2019 - Critical Discourse Studies 17 (4):359-376.
The Red Gold: analysing a nexus of practices.Inger Lassen - 2008 - Critical Discourse Studies 5 (1):1-19.
Integral gnosis and the material other.Eero Karhu - 2015 - Approaching Religion 5 (2):79-92.
On Intertextuality.Yu-Ping Li - 2006 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 3:111-117.
Scientific Atheism as a Cultural System.Olena Panych - 2015 - Ukrainian Religious Studies 76:21-35.
Some ethnopsychological aspects of Ukrainian religiosity.T. Dlinna - 1996 - Ukrainian Religious Studies 3:27-28.
Future Ukrainian’s Image: Modern Vision.Nezhyva Olga - 2015 - Философия И Космология 14 (1):173-176.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-21

Downloads
5 (#1,344,154)

6 months
3 (#445,838)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references