¿Dios con o sin el ser?. Apuntes acerca de la onto-teo-logía

Espíritu 66:71-86 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Heidegger’s famous critique of the onto-theo-logy accuses the whole Western metaphysics of having led us to a “forgetfulness of being”. The following pages pay attention to two attempts to respond to this attack: Marion’s, who prefers, with Heidegger, to liberate God from the realms of being; Gilson’s, who attributed to Thomas Aquinas a natural theology in a certain discontinuity with classical metaphysics. Secondly, this article intends to propose a clearer continuity between the Christian concept of God and Aristotelian ontology in particular, which is itself open.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

MacIntyre’s Gilsonian Preference.Peter Mango - 2013 - Studia Gilsoniana 2:21–32.
Jean-Luc Marion on the Divine and Taking the "Third Way".Panu-Matti Pöykkoö - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9 (2):189-211.
Indeterminismo y providencia divina.Ignacio Silva - 2013 - Anuario Filosófico 46 (2):405-422.
The spirit of Thomism.Etienne Gilson - 1964 - New York,: P. J. Kenedy.
Correspondance, 1923-1971: deux approches de l'être.Étienne Gilson & Jacques Maritain - 1991 - Paris: Librairie philosophique J. Vrin. Edited by Jacques Maritain & Géry Prouvost.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-11

Downloads
164 (#113,458)

6 months
80 (#52,858)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Torrijos-Castrillejo
Universidad Eclesiástica San Dámaso

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references