Argumentation 4 (1):109-124 (1990)

Abstract
Theoretical interest in Perelman's thought is linked, for the main part, to the place he accords to the notion of argumentation, defined in his work in reference to the Greek philosophy, as represented by Plato and Aristotle, in contrast to the assertions of the sophists and rhetors. He separates the notion of demonstration and that of argumentation and supports his position on an analysis of the debates which were common in the sophistic and rhetoric period.It is in different ways that the notion of argumentation comes into the work of Perelman. By taking up again the analysis of justice with the aim of removing the various strata of meaning which had accumulated on it as a result of the reductions of Plato and the dialectical analyses of Aristotle, Perelman showed that the theory of argumentation transcends the domain of right in which it is rooted and ought not be abandoned to lawyers only. Thus, he follows a train of thought to which he accords a certain nobilty in the name of the new rhetoric. This manner of considering the relationship of the moderns to the Greeks leads him to set up the notion of argumentation in his own texts, where it demonstrates a logical retreat which enables him to work back from Aristotle to Plato and from him to the rhetors and sophists, whose discourse is defined on the level of the self-referential.The exemplary character of Perelman's work is on account of this rehabilitation of argumentation in the old rhetoric which will be examined here
Keywords Perelman  Sophists  sophistry  Protagoras  Gorgias  Plato  Aristotle  rhetoric  justice  argumentation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00186302
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,944
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Le Champ de l'Argumentation.Chaim Perelman - 1972 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 5 (4):255-257.
Le Champ de L'Argumentation.Chaim Perelman - 1985 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 41 (1):109-109.
Rhétorique Et Philosophie.Ch Perelman & L. Olbrechts-Tyteca - 1960 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 16 (3):398-398.
Le champ de l'argumentation.Chaïm Perelman - 1973 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 163:367-367.
Bibliographie de Chaim Perelman.L. Olbrechts-Tyteca & E. Griffin-Collart - 1979 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 127 (128):325-342.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Logic or Rhetoric in Law?Alain Lempereur - 1991 - Argumentation 5 (3):283-297.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-01-04

Total views
28 ( #405,466 of 2,498,136 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #428,301 of 2,498,136 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes