Utilitas 24 (2):200-213 (2012)
AbstractPerhaps the best-known theory of fairness is John Broome’s: that fairness is the proportional satisfaction of claims. In this article, I question whether claims are the appropriate focus for a theory of fairness, at least as Broome understands them in his current theory. If fairness is the proportionate satisfaction of claims, I argue, then the following would be true: fairness could not help determine the correct distribution of claims; fairness could not be used to evaluate the distribution of claims; fairness could not guide us in distributing claims (or unowed goods); we could not have a claim to be treated fairly; and we would not be wronged when treated unfairly. These entailments mean that it is questionable that fairness is concerned with claims in the way Broome suggests. At the very least, the relationship between fairness and claims appears to be more complex than the picture painted by Broome.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Citations of this work
Against Lottocracy.Lachlan Montgomery Umbers - 2018 - European Journal of Political Theory 20 (2):312-334.
Dividing the Indivisible: Apportionment and Philosophical Theories of Fairness.Conrad Heilmann & Stefan Wintein - 2018 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 17 (1):51-74.
Theories of Fairness and Aggregation.Stefan Wintein & Conrad Heilmann - 2020 - Erkenntnis 85 (3):715-738.
Similar books and articles
Rawls and the Status of Political Liberty.Steven Wall - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (2):245–270.
Can a Compromise Be Fair?Peter Jones & Ian O’Flynn - 2013 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12 (2):115-135.
Is Fairness Good? A Critique of Varian's Theory of Fairness.Robert Sugden - 1984 - Noûs 18 (3):505-511.
Fairness, Political Obligation, and the Justificatory Gap.Jiafeng Zhu - 2014 - Journal of Moral Philosophy (4):1-23.
The Injustice of Enforced Equal Access to Transplant Operations: Rethinking Reckless Claims of Fairness.H. Tristram Engelhardt - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (2):256-264.
Fairness, Equality and Needs as Claims to Education. (Or HOW to Steal the Egalitarian's Clothes).Malcolm S. Justins - 1970 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 4 (1):121–137.
Fairness, Feelings, and Ethical Decision- Making: Consequences of Violating Community Standards of Fairness. [REVIEW]Maurice E. Schweitzer & Donald E. Gibson - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 77 (3):287 - 301.
Fairness in Hierarchical and Entrepreneurial Firms.Michael K. Green - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (11):877-882.
Fairness in the Selection of Employees.Richard D. Arvey & Gary L. Renz - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (5-6):331-340.
Justice in the Greenhouse: Climate Change and the Idea of Fairness.Steve Vanderheiden - 2003 - Social Philosophy Today 19:89-101.