Extending the Limits of Nature. Political Animals, Artefacts, and Social Institutions

Philosophical Readings 1 (12):35-44 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay discusses how medieval authors from the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries dealt with a philosophical problem that social institutions pose for the Aristotelian dichotomy between natural and artificial entities. It is argued that marriage, political community, and language provided a particular challenge for the conception that things which are designed by human beings are artefacts. Medieval philosophers based their arguments for the naturalness of social institutions on the anthropological view that human beings are political animals by nature, but this strategy required rethinking the borderline between nature and art. The limits of nature were extended, as social institutions were considered to be natural even though they are in many ways similar to artificial products.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Non-Aristotelian Political Animals.Ben Bryan - 2015 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 32 (4):293-311.
Culture by nature.Neil Levy - 2011 - Philosophical Explorations 14 (3):237-248.
Political inertia and social acceleration.Bart Zantvoort - 2017 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 43 (7):707-723.
The issue of federalization of Ukraine in Russian political thought.O. Poplavskiy & H. Boyarskaya - 2012 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 3 (22):167-172.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-01

Downloads
282 (#69,315)

6 months
80 (#54,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Juhana Toivanen
University of Jyväskylä

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references