Kant contra el Leibizianismo

Tópicos: Revista de Filosofía 39 (1):77-104 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper analyzes and discusses the principle of Succession, formulated by Kant in 1755s Nova Dilucidatio. The principle, as we will see, shows that the kind of causally isolated substances invoked in pre-established harmony are incapable of undergoing change. After first analyzing Kant’s specific arguments in order to prove his principle, I shall argue that the Kantian critique against the leibnizians refers to the general bias consisting in putting on a level the logical and real realms, and consequently to confuse the concepts of logical ground and real cause.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant on real definitions in geometry.Jeremy Heis - 2014 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44 (5-6):605-630.
Lacan and the concept of the 'real'.Tom Eyers - 2012 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Kant on Real Grounds and Grounds of Being.Michael Oberst - 2021 - In Beatrix Himmelmann & Camilla Serck-Hanssen (eds.), The Court of Reason: Proceedings of the 13th International Kant Congress. De Gruyter. pp. 585-595.
Leibniz frente al ocasionalismo. La lucha por la autonomía de la razón.Juan Antonio Nicolás - 2021 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 54 (2):313-329.
¿Por qué Leibniz requiere Del tiempo absoluto?C. Vaughan - 2007 - Ideas Y Valores 56 (134):23-44.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-10

Downloads
3 (#1,682,188)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references