Authors
Abstract
This paper argues that Noether's axiomatic method in algebra cannot be assimilated to Weyl's late view on axiomatics, for his acquiescence to a phenomenological epistemology of correctness led Weyl to resist Noether's principle of detachment.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/712942
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,114
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Which Symmetry? Noether, Weyl, and Conservation of Electric Charge.A. K. - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (1):3-22.
General Covariance From the Perspective of Noether's Theorems.Katherine Brading & Harvey Brown - 2002 - Diálogos. Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Puerto Rico 37 (79):59-86.
A History Of Algebra: From Al-Khwarizmi To Emmy Noether. [REVIEW]J. Gray - 1987 - British Journal for the History of Science 20 (1):96-97.
General Covariance From the Perspective of Noether's Theorems.Harvey Brown & Katherine Brading - 2002 - Fenomenologia. Diálogos Possíveis Campinas: Alínea/Goiânia: Editora da Puc Goiás 79:59-86.
Dual Axiomatics.Reinhard Kahle - 2019 - In Mario Augusto Bunge, Michael R. Matthews, Guillermo M. Denegri, Eduardo L. Ortiz, Heinz W. Droste, Alberto Cordero, Pierre Deleporte, María Manzano, Manuel Crescencio Moreno, Dominique Raynaud, Íñigo Ongay de Felipe, Nicholas Rescher, Richard T. W. Arthur, Rögnvaldur D. Ingthorsson, Evandro Agazzi, Ingvar Johansson, Joseph Agassi, Nimrod Bar-Am, Alberto Cupani, Gustavo E. Romero, Andrés Rivadulla, Art Hobson, Olival Freire Junior, Peter Slezak, Ignacio Morgado-Bernal, Marta Crivos, Leonardo Ivarola, Andreas Pickel, Russell Blackford, Michael Kary, A. Z. Obiedat, Carolina I. García Curilaf, Rafael González del Solar, Luis Marone, Javier Lopez de Casenave, Francisco Yannarella, Mauro A. E. Chaparro, José Geiser Villavicencio- Pulido, Martín Orensanz, Jean-Pierre Marquis, Reinhard Kahle, Ibrahim A. Halloun, José María Gil, Omar Ahmad, Byron Kaldis, Marc Silberstein, Carolina I. García Curilaf, Rafael González del Solar, Javier Lopez de Casenave, Íñigo Ongay de Felipe & Villavicencio-Pulid (eds.), Mario Bunge: A Centenary Festschrift. Springer Verlag. pp. 633-642.
Why Axiomatize?Mario Bunge - 2017 - Foundations of Science 22 (4):695-707.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-08-18

Total views
174 ( #66,522 of 2,499,260 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #169,627 of 2,499,260 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes