Should Parents be Licensed? Debating the Issues

(ed.)
Prometheus (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Would-be teachers are generally required to study fulltime for at least eight months before the state will allow them the responsibility of educating children for six hours a day. Many would say we have set the bar too low. And yet we haven’t even set the bar as high — in fact we haven’t set a bar at all — for parents. Should there be a national parenting policy, including mandatory parenthood training and screening of prospective parents? In this informative and thought-provoking collection of articles, experts from the disciplines of philosophy, psychology, psychiatry, law, political science, public health, sociology, and anthropology consider the many issues involved in licensing parents. Following a thorough introduction to these issues, editor Peg Tittle presents the contributions in three major sections. The first part focuses on parenting, presenting several proposals for licensing, then taking a closer look at the problem of assessing nurturing skills, drawing on work done in the areas of custody, adoption, and new reproductive technologies. The second part focuses on parentage, exploring the moral acceptability of passing on genetic disease, as well as the moral implications of genetic engineering. The third part examines in greater detail objections and replies to the concept of licensing parents. Does everyone have the right to have children? Should contraception ever be mandatory? Should prenatal abuse be criminalized? The informed debate on these and many other perplexing questions presented in this stimulating book will help to clarify this increasingly important issue.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Licensing parents.Hugh LaFollette - 1980 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 9 (2):182-197.
Licensing Parents Revisited.Hugh Lafollette - 2010 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (4):327-343.
Fundamental interests and parental rights.Michael W. Austin - 2007 - International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (2):221-235.
Licensing Parents to Protect Our Children?Jurgen De Wispelaere & Daniel Weinstock - 2012 - Ethics and Social Welfare 6 (2):195-205.
The Ethics of Parenthood.Norvin Richards - 2010 - New York, US: Oup Usa.
Choosing Disabilities and Enhancements in Children: A Choice too Far?Timothy F. Murphy - 2009 - Reproductie Biomedicine Online 2009 (18 sup. 1):43-49.
Child Abuse: parental rights and the interests of the child.David Archard - 1990 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 7 (2):183-194.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-29

Downloads
51 (#306,042)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Licensing Parents to Protect Our Children?Jurgen De Wispelaere & Daniel Weinstock - 2012 - Ethics and Social Welfare 6 (2):195-205.
Against parental licensing.Christopher Freiman - 2022 - Journal of Social Philosophy 53 (1):113-126.
Some advantages to having a parent with a disability.Adam Cureton - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (1):31-34.
Parents with Disabilities.Adam Cureton - 2017 - In Leslie Francis (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Reproductive Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 407-427.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references