Reply to Kim’s “Two Versions of Sleeping Beauty”

Erkenntnis 80 (6):1237-1243 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I begin by discussing a conundrum that arises when Bayesian models attempt to assess the relevance of one claim to another. I then explain how my formal modeling framework manages this conundrum. Finally, I apply my modeling methodology to respond to Namjoong Kim’s objection to my framework

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The relevance of self-locating beliefs.Michael G. Titelbaum - 2008 - Philosophical Review 117 (4):555-606.
Everettian Confirmation and Sleeping Beauty: Reply to Wilson.Darren Bradley - 2015 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (3):683-693.
Inertia, Optimism and Beauty.Patrick Hawley - 2013 - Noûs 47 (1):85-103.
Everettian Confirmation and Sleeping Beauty.Alastair Wilson - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (3):axt018.
Sleeping beauty should be imprecise.Daniel Jeremy Singer - 2014 - Synthese 191 (14):3159-3172.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-14

Downloads
73 (#220,898)

6 months
21 (#122,177)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Titelbaum
University of Wisconsin, Madison

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations